GAW and Garza, this way…
XPY has been in “beta” for over a year now and the new platform wont change that. It’s not like there hasn’t been 100 beta platforms over the last year from GAW to TeamXPY and there has been “always” issues with each one of them. Most of them security related aka “hacked” and co. TeamXPY will to have first proof to people that they can actually produce (and sustain) a secure platform before people would even consider looking at XPY again.
This coin and its features, and the platform, it is all still under construction.
Again, coin, features and platforms have been “under construction” for over a year now and XPY is still not even close to what was proposed in the white paper(s).
Not to forget that slacks pretty quickly disappear unless you subscribe to their service. I dislike slack for anything “important” because if someone doesn’t log on for a couple of days and if there has been some activity chances are that the important stuff has been already archived and therefore can’t be retrieved / viewed.
Some of “this” would be a start… https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Ox2aEXCxMJaV9oTHlWMllneFk
If we’re honest there has been no major changes to the code to implement any of the 2.0 changes outlined in the original whitepaper.
I am trying to find out what would be considered a “distinguishing unique valuable” feature.
In an dying altcoin landscape. What happened to smart contract capabilities, two-way double deposit escrow, thermal-hybrid-flex-blabla and the implementation of (one of the) smart asset protocols. I remember the last point being discussed in particular about one year ago when GetHashing launched the smart asset platform. I guess the “idea” has vaporized again since it would have required “serious coding” on XPY.
You should check out